Thursday, July 15, 2010

Tom Delonge Tattoo Bunny




The Government of Chile has the obligation to submit to the ILO a detailed report of application of Convention 169, after a year ratified the Convention.

Deadline expires on September 1, 2010.


a few weeks after the deadline for submission of the report, the Government of S. PiƱera omits any mention of the Convention 169. What is the content of the official report submitted on the application of Convention 169?

Does the Government of its obligation to make a memory? Are you aware that this report should be made known and consulted in advance?

On the other hand, how could indigenous organizations require access to official information and prior consultation before they are sent?

What role can parliamentarians, senators and deputies of Human Rights Commissions? (We represent as PPD, Tucapel Jimenez and Ximena Vidal)

What responsibilities incumbent on the Council of CONADI?

What role can the United Workers Central, CUT, and indigenous-led unions?

And, how useful the test may have a "memory" for communities to defend themselves against mega-projects, or those who claim their land or those who claim their liberty?

In sum what good is a Report of Convention 169, and how to make an impact effective?

As P D P we must realize in this matter and inform the people well for trasnmitir originating these issues. We believe that the fight is not through violence but through respect of fulfilling the duties as the State of Chile that we owe to all the indigenous peoples of Chile.

More information regarding the treaty: http://www.politicaspublicas.net/panel/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=661:desafio-memoria-c169&catid=29: implementation & Itemid = 440


Hello everyone.

0 comments:

Post a Comment