Faced with the reaction they've had 2 of our Party Parliamentarians (G. Girardi, E. Acorssi) compared to the debate raised and put back to the table against nuclear energy, we seem anecdotal bad attitude inform the public of a "possible" danger with respect to nuclear fission plants are 2 doctors ! , not even an engineer or a physicist, this leads through ignorance propose debates terror to citizenship with a clear repudiation of the construction of these plants.
Getting in the case as indicated for the debate, that the rise of this energy safely and with zero emission of pollutants into the atmosphere , you are 40 years with a start-up of approx. 15 years, means that we will enjoy at least 25 years of efficient energy production. Since the life of a hydroelectric plant is between 25 to 30 years, the comparison is quite enough. Okay, but compare the residues of course are radioactive, but the exchange of technology for the treatment makes the management of those wastes are extremely safe to the environment, or perhaps "the chemicals from the large tailings mining disappear by magic?, such contaminants can be treated even today, and management in Chile and is now highly contaminated areas due to the drag of material particulate into the wind and groundwater.
then spread fear without knowing the engineering and technological processes behind the management of these plants, makes it extremely irresponsible for the opinions expressed.
course, Chile is immensely rich in energy resources, environmental friendly, kind of wind, solar, tidal and above all geothermal, but the lack and that share of a country on energy policy makes the construction of a power generation development in these resources today are obstructed. We
as consultation and even more as PPD, to establish the construction of energy policies that leave the use of energy we have available in Chile and how that investment is currently protected. Lithium is already being called for attention to requests for release of this resource as not strategic, it can be, or worse, the massive speculation that arose in geothermal to ask for concessions from the best alternatives for future surveys with great potential for success has not been part of the debate, seeing as speculation has led to slow this development when we have to ENAP as part of the National Geothermal and that seems to have rested on its laurels, simply to make good use of example you are giving the machine drilling in the rescue of the miners, this machine was paralyzed!.
then invite you to join our MPs to think about energy policy real and serious, we have no Senators in the commission of Mines and Energy of the Senate (or at least overlook generated the debate), and the camera have 2 MPs PPD ( F. Núñez and M. Harboe ) out of 13 where 3 is conclusion, 1 PC and the other on the right. So opaques not what the country should be a leap into the technological development in production and nuclear energy research, the future of the country should have this kind of energy, as well as other renewables to a greater extent, but debate should not be in populism or demagoguery based on ignorance and scare the population that creates the development of nuclear plants, no real information about the existing high standards in the management of production of such energy.
course, Chile is immensely rich in energy resources, environmental friendly, kind of wind, solar, tidal and above all geothermal, but the lack and that share of a country on energy policy makes the construction of a power generation development in these resources today are obstructed. We
as consultation and even more as PPD, to establish the construction of energy policies that leave the use of energy we have available in Chile and how that investment is currently protected. Lithium is already being called for attention to requests for release of this resource as not strategic, it can be, or worse, the massive speculation that arose in geothermal to ask for concessions from the best alternatives for future surveys with great potential for success has not been part of the debate, seeing as speculation has led to slow this development when we have to ENAP as part of the National Geothermal and that seems to have rested on its laurels, simply to make good use of example you are giving the machine drilling in the rescue of the miners, this machine was paralyzed!.
then invite you to join our MPs to think about energy policy real and serious, we have no Senators in the commission of Mines and Energy of the Senate (or at least overlook generated the debate), and the camera have 2 MPs PPD ( F. Núñez and M. Harboe ) out of 13 where 3 is conclusion, 1 PC and the other on the right. So opaques not what the country should be a leap into the technological development in production and nuclear energy research, the future of the country should have this kind of energy, as well as other renewables to a greater extent, but debate should not be in populism or demagoguery based on ignorance and scare the population that creates the development of nuclear plants, no real information about the existing high standards in the management of production of such energy.
